Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:10:54 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
And the article doesn't even mention the massive layoffs and cutbacks that happened on the same day.
Carolyn
________________________________________
From: Center for Theory [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Enid Arvidson [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 3:33 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: science, fiction, or science fiction?! (from Texas A&M)
The troubling thing, for me, is that the theory (or ideology, as
Althusser would call it) that underlies and drives these policies is
very one-sided and blind to many things. Yet the more these policies
are in place, the more likely they create conditions for fewer faculty
to teach critiques of these policies and alternative theories and ways
of thinking.
On Sep 2, 2010, at 1:14 PM, Alaimo, Stacy wrote:
> We can only hope so!
>
> Stacy Alaimo
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Center for Theory [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Agger, Ben [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 1:06 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: science, fiction, or science fiction?! (from Texas A&M)
>
> Perhaps this news item was really penned on April Fool's Day!
>
>
> http://www.theeagle.com/am/A-amp-amp-M-grades-faculty
>
>
> --ben
|
|
|